| | | | | | | | | 1972(?) Super Corsa stripping, dent, rust | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:53 pm |
|
|
vanhelmont |
|
|
|
Joined: 11 Dec 2007 |
Posts: 242 |
Location: Florida |
|
|
|
When my forkless frame arrived, my first thought was it deserved a decent burial. There is no sign of any head-on collision, but the dent on the top tube was worse than it looked in the pictures on ebay. The picture of the dent was blurred (and I have since found that it isn't so easy to get good photos of bike details with a typical digital camera), and it's a little off to one side, so it doesn't show up in the picture below. The listing said the tube was straight, but it looked funny to me. With a plastic ruler I still wasn't sure, so I got my steel rule, and found out it was very slightly bent. I tried to bend it back straight by supporting the tube at the lugs, and pushing on it with a big c-clamp, with a block grooved to fit over the tube. Then I decided the dent might be causing it not to be straight, so I clamped two blocks together, and drilled a 25.4 mm hole. I clamped them on the dented part of the tube, and that pushed in the parts that had been pushed out to the sides by the dent. It also pushed the tube a little out of round, so maybe I should have sanded the hole out closer to 26 mm, but I think the tube is straight, so I was happy.
Also inside the seat tube was a spider web with lots of red dust, so I thought it might have serious rust problems. When I cleaned it out there didn't seem to be any internal rust other than a little in the seat and head tubes. Just to be sure, I sealed up the openings of the frame with electrical tape and put in about 100 ml of an automotive rust treatment, then tipped the frame around so that the stuff would go everywhere. I repeated the tipping a couple of times, over the course of the day, then the next morning emptied it out. Any rust should be converted to an iron phosphate chromate, which provides a sort of protective coating.
I used a water-based gel for stripping. It's safe but much less effective than other paint removers I have used. That might be because it was too runny to get a thick layer on the surfaces. I stuck with it because I could use it inside without ventilation. After removing the paint with a scraper, wire brushes (the little round brass wire brush was a lifesaver for tight places), a scrubbing pad, and steel wool, I did a little sanding with 320 sandpaper to get most of the rust off, then "painted" it with the rust treatment. It turns the rusted spots brown, and showed up rust that I couldn't see in spots I had sanded. My conclusion is, if you strip a frame, unless you really do a lot of sanding, use some kind of a phosphate rust treatment to get rid of any rust you may have missed.
I did a little lug filing. After about an hour with a couple of little files, it's not ready for NAHBS, but I think it's a big improvement.
Hope my experiences will be some use to somebody out there.
Dave
Tampa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Water based paint remover | | | | | |
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 10:15 am |
|
|
verktyg |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Jan 2007 |
Posts: 2814 |
Location: SF Bay Area |
|
|
|
It's too bad about the dent in the top tube (see links below).
I've carefully checked out the pictures of all the frames and bikes that I bought on eBay. When something didn't look right I asked the seller and requested more pictures or clarification. If I'm not comfortable with the response I don't bid.
Last year I bought an early 80s Motobecane Team frame on eBay. There were no tubing stickers on the frame. It could have been either Reynolds 753 or Columbus SL tubing which would pin down the age.
The seller was local and when I picked it up from him the first thing I did was check out the fork shape to determine if it was Reynolds or Columbus tubing. The fork blades had a strange shape so I immediately looked down at the fork dropouts: Tange!
It was a Tange replacement fork! Next thing I did was feel under the top and down tubes at the head tube. There were little ripples under the tubes indicating that the bike had been crashed! (I sensed that the seller was a newbie fixie freak and perhaps ran into the back of a car. I don't think that he even realized that the frame was damaged.)
I renegotiated the price on the spot and got a substantial refund from the seller. Even though I got a great deal on the frame it was still a major disappointment. Team bikes and frames are really rare. The Tange replacement fork is a really good match to the original but it's still damaged goods. A year later the bare frame is still hanging in my basement.
I also bought a 1978 Motobecane Team frame on eBay (Sorry Stephan, I have a much larger collection of Motobecanes than Gitanes - Motos are easier to find). The were some spots on top tube in the eBay pictures but the seller assured me that they were just where "the paint had worn off".
When I received the frame I saw that they were dents that had been repaired with Bondo. I got the frame for so cheap that I've kept it for a beater or stationary bike whenever I get some time to build it up.
Back to your frame:
There is a water based paint remover made by 3M that's quite effective. A local frame builder uses it all the time. I haven't been ably to find it in any paint or auto parts store but it's out there somewhere.
I've seen old repairs that were done with brass or lead. Today most frame builders us Bondo or similar 2 part epoxy auto body filler to repair dents in frame tubes. Also, auto body "spotting putty" or compound is great for filling minor dings and voids after you primer the frame.
Lastly, you should check the frame alignment while you are at it. A properly aligned frame makes a world of difference in handling, especially on a larger sized frame.
Check out these links:
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-spacing.html
http://www.parktool.com/repair/readhowto.asp?id=40
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRDfzZsOwZQ
http://www.yellowjersey.org/twist.html
http://www.parktool.com/repair/readhowto.asp?id=43
You can get pretty close without a lot of special tools.
Chas. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:17 am |
|
|
greyhundguy |
|
|
|
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 |
Posts: 678 |
Location: South-Central VIRGINIA |
|
|
|
WOW!...what a difference in braze work. This is my Interclub frame after striping. Must have been a 1 liter Lunch the day they made the SC.
I've done NO finish work to the brazing and will repaint it as built. Frame is under 3 coats of primer now. I'm waiting for the humidity to go away so I can paint and clear coat it.
Jay |
|
_________________ Dance like nobody is watching. |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Gitane sandblasting | | | | | |
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 11:12 am |
|
|
verktyg |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Jan 2007 |
Posts: 2814 |
Location: SF Bay Area |
|
|
|
Jay,
It looked like Gitane used rocks in their sand blasting equipment. They blasted away all of the excess flux and braze material on the frames made with heavier gage tubing. This left a bad orange peel finish in the metal.
I don't think that they sand blasted their Reynolds frames.
They applied a heavy coating of white primer to the bare metal and a thin top coat of finish paint. When the primer coat was too thick it resulted in a finish that was very fragile and easily scratched. This was quite common on bikes made during the US Bike Boom days.
Gitane improved their finish quality in 1974 but it was too little, too late because the Boom was almost over by then.
Chas. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:44 pm |
|
|
vanhelmont |
|
|
|
Joined: 11 Dec 2007 |
Posts: 242 |
Location: Florida |
|
|
|
Chas.,
The dent looked bad when I got the bike, but since I squeezed the part that stuck out at the sides back in, it isn't so noticeable. I guess I could get out the propane torch and try to solder it, but I'm going to use a plumbing epoxy.
Thanks for the alignment links. I checked alignment of the front triangle like the Taylor brothers in this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMA8X5pk2kI
At the end they also use string to check something, and I wrapped a string from the rear dropouts, around the head tube, and measured from the string to the seat tube on each side. When I pulled out the right rear dropout to make the two sides even, it went from about 114mm to 120mm between the rear dropouts. I made a crude copy of the Park dropout alignment tool with threaded rod, nuts, and fender washers. It should at least serve for checking, and if it's off I'll take it to the shop.
Yeah, Jay, maybe it was a 1 liter lunch. At least I can imagine the frame was brazed by a happy Frenchman!
Chas. said, "Gitane improved their finish quality in 1974 but it was too little, too late because the Boom was almost over by then."
I wonder if some of the sloppiness could have been because they were trying to build as fast as they possibly could. I can't see that any of it has any structural effect. There was one spot on the lower head lug that looked like it might not have been brazed properly, but when I stripped it the brass was just below the edge of the lug. Then in 1974, maybe because the boom was ending, or they had managed to expand enough that they could take the time to be neater. I'm not going to try to duplicate the thick primer. I may do a tiny bit more of sanding or filing, but I'll remember, it was built to ride, not to look at.
A British guy who worked in one of the many small builders active in the late '40s and '50s said that one guy in his shop did a lot of chainstay replacements on Hetchins, because they would often rust and fail within a couple of years, because they didn't clean out the flux properly after brazing. The best I could see in my chainstays with a little mirror and flashlight there was no significant rust after 30+ years. Even if it looks sloppy, Gitane seems to have taken care of the essential things. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 9:53 pm |
|
|
verktyg |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Jan 2007 |
Posts: 2814 |
Location: SF Bay Area |
|
|
|
vanhelmont wrote: |
The dent looked bad when I got the bike, but since I squeezed the part that stuck out at the sides back in, it isn't so noticeable. I guess I could get out the propane torch and try to solder it, but I'm going to use a plumbing epoxy. |
I wouldn't try to fix the dent with heat - could result in a can of worms. You should be able to get a small container of 2 part epoxy body filler at any auto parts store. It's easy to work with and will give you good results.
vanhelmont wrote: |
Thanks for the alignment links. I checked alignment of the front triangle like the Taylor brothers.....
At the end they also use string to check something, and I wrapped a string from the rear dropouts, around the head tube, and measured from the string to the seat tube on each side. When I pulled out the right rear dropout to make the two sides even, it went from about 114mm to 120mm between the rear dropouts. I made a crude copy of the Park dropout alignment tool with threaded rod, nuts, and fender washers. It should at least serve for checking, and if it's off I'll take it to the shop. |
It's important to make sure that the head tube is parallel with the seat tube. The Park link shows how to use a simple magnetic dial protractor. Set the seat tube to 0° in a holding fixture and then check the head tube. They should be within a degree or two of each other (or .005" / .012mm if you use an indicator).
When the head tube in aligned with the rest of the frame the bike will track straight (provided that the forks are also aligned).
The fact that the rear triangle was scrunched down to 114mm would seen to indicate one of 2 things. Either the frame was damaged at some point in transit which is quite a common occurrence - the forks and stays should always blocked for shipping. Or else someone could have been using an old narrow rear track hub in the frame.
The string trick is handy for aligning the rear triangle. You should also check out the frame with a well trued and properly dished rear wheel to check the space between the seat stays at the brake bridge.
Your home made dropout tools should work great. You can use a large adjustable wrench (crescent) wrench to bend the dropouts into alignment. Make sure that there is a lot of contact with the dropouts near where that are brazed into the seat stays so that you don't bend or break them.
vanhelmont wrote: |
I wonder if some of the sloppiness could have been because they were trying to build as fast as they possibly could. I can't see that any of it has any structural effect. There was one spot on the lower head lug that looked like it might not have been brazed properly, but when I stripped it the brass was just below the edge of the lug. Then in 1974, maybe because the boom was ending, or they had managed to expand enough that they could take the time to be neater. I'm not going to try to duplicate the thick primer. |
That's exactly what was happening. European bike makers were pushing bikes out the door as fast as they could assemble and box them up. At one point we got a 40' trailer full of Gitanes and were selling bikes faster than we could unload and assemble them.
American consumers grabbed up anything that looked like a "10 speed"!
By 1974 there was some competition from the Japanese in the US bike market. Even though most Japanese bikes were built to the US importer's specs and frequently rode and handled like wheelbarrows, they sold well to newby bike buyers because they looked cosmetically better.
The brazing at the tips of the lugs is not very critical. It's far more important to get enough brazing material into the areas inside the lugs where the tubes butt up to each other.
Here's some suggestions for painting. Apply a THIN uniform coat of primer. After it dries you can fill in any glaring gaps and dings with auto body spotting putty. Put on an even, THIN smooth layer or two of color paint being careful to avoid runs. After it dries, you can apply a clearcoat layer which will hide a lot of imperfections.
vanhelmont wrote: |
A British guy who worked in one of the many small builders active in the late '40s and '50s said that one guy in his shop did a lot of chainstay replacements on Hetchins, because they would often rust and fail within a couple of years, because they didn't clean out the flux properly after brazing. The best I could see in my chainstays with a little mirror and flashlight there was no significant rust after 30+ years. Even if it looks sloppy, Gitane seems to have taken care of the essential things. |
A couple of points, it rains a lot in the UK, Hetchins generally used the thinest gage fork blades and stays that Reynolds produced and they may have used more corrosive fluxes than what was used by Gitane.
I don't recall ever seen a Gitane frame fail from poor workmanship. Brit frame builders were notorious for their lack of tending to details like flushing out excess flux. They made great looking bikes but....
Chas. |
|
Last edited by verktyg on Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:18 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 4:53 am |
|
|
greyhundguy |
|
|
|
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 |
Posts: 678 |
Location: South-Central VIRGINIA |
|
|
|
Chas wrote:"Gitane improved their finish quality in 1974 but it was too little, too late because the Boom was almost over by then".
Then it wasn't just the rock blasting on my Frame as it is a '74-75 with the Honeycomb rear dropouts.
Jay |
|
_________________ Dance like nobody is watching. |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Paint quality | | | | | |
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:31 am |
|
|
verktyg |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Jan 2007 |
Posts: 2814 |
Location: SF Bay Area |
|
|
|
Jay,
There was a major improvement in Gitane paint quality after 1973. The paint and lugwork on my Gold 1973 Super Corsa was pretty good (by French standards)
A lot of Gitanes came with "candy apple" or "flamboyant" transparent lacquer on top of the white primer. You could see the surface indentations from the sandblasting or shot peening in the tubes, especially on Gitane Gran Sport model bikes built during the Bike Boom.
Chas. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
|