| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:32 am |
|
|
Gtane |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Sep 2007 |
Posts: 681 |
Location: UK |
|
|
|
Chas,
That drilled machine really is a work of art. Perhaps this is something that might make a return.
I wonder, could we see drilled carbon fibre components, on a carbon frame?
Tim |
|
_________________ Everything has a cycle |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:47 am |
|
|
Gtane |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Sep 2007 |
Posts: 681 |
Location: UK |
|
|
|
|
_________________ Everything has a cycle |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:19 am |
|
|
verktyg |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Jan 2007 |
Posts: 2814 |
Location: SF Bay Area |
|
|
|
Gtane wrote: |
Chas,
That drilled machine really is a work of art. Perhaps this is something that might make a return.
I wonder, could we see drilled carbon fibre components, on a carbon frame?
Tim |
I can just hear a drillium carbon fiber reinforced composite bike going down the road sounding like a flute ensemble!
Catastrophic failure in CFRC (carbon) is unpredictable enough without putting in more holes. Besides the stuff is so abrasive that it requires diamond tipped or coated tools to cut it.
A friend that I ride with also races sailboats. He tells of witnessing a CFRC sailboat break in half and sink while anchored at the San Diego Yacht Club.
Chas. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:38 am |
|
|
verktyg |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Jan 2007 |
Posts: 2814 |
Location: SF Bay Area |
|
|
|
Paul Wiseman wrote: |
I am saddened that the mechanical side of the sport has changed so much. Without doubt, we have better equipment at more affordable process. However, change and innovation is now something that you "purchase" rather than something you "do". Innovation still happens, but it happens inside CAD programs and wind tunnels. It no longer happens in a 15 year old boy's garage. |
A number of the same folks that got carried away with drillium also went on to be innovators in the bicycle industry. Peter Johnson, Tom Ritchie and several others went to high school together or were from the same local in the San Francisco Bay Area. They started doing drillium when they were teenagers. They were also pretty active Junior Class road racers.
More drillium (scroll down to "Drillium Info")
http://www.tearsforgears.com/search/label/drillium
and... too much of a good thing is not always better!
http://www.wooljersey.com/gallery/v/Wayne-Bingham/Drillium/
Chas. Holey Cow! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:18 pm |
|
|
Paul Wiseman |
|
|
|
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 |
Posts: 584 |
Location: Brisbane, Australia |
|
|
|
sandranian wrote: |
Why would you need tight geometry on a TT machine? I get pulling the back wheel in, but why such a squirrely front end? I guess having the distances shorter for most TTs, you wouldn't need comfort. But you also wouldn't need an especially nimble machine, would you? |
I think it partly came about from the track. Teams pursuit and road teams time trial had closer links back then when all road riders rode the track as well. Now they have become almost two different sports. In the teams pursuit, one theory was to shorten the length of each bike in order to make the whole teams shorter and thus more aerodynamic (I have my doubts as to the validity of the aere theory, but it might have helped with swapping off). This finally ended with the use of funny bikes with 24" front wheels. Remember the bikes used by the USA in the TP at LA84?
This one is hanging in Yamaguci's workshop. Hmmmm...
Of course it is important to remember that despite the USA having rubberized skinsuits, aero helmets, funny bikes and disc wheels, they got flogged by the Aussies on standard machines and spoked wheels........ bet they had some drillium too! |
|
_________________ Wisey
Brisbane, Australia
1974 Paris - Nice
1985 Defi
1985 Victoire
1985 Victoire (yes, another one!)
1985 Professionnel |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:25 pm |
|
|
Paul Wiseman |
|
|
|
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 |
Posts: 584 |
Location: Brisbane, Australia |
|
|
|
Gtane wrote: |
Chas,
That drilled machine really is a work of art. Perhaps this is something that might make a return.
I wonder, could we see drilled carbon fibre components, on a carbon frame?
Tim |
Here ya go
Although, I think it would be moulded rather than drilled. Does that make it mouldium?
|
|
_________________ Wisey
Brisbane, Australia
1974 Paris - Nice
1985 Defi
1985 Victoire
1985 Victoire (yes, another one!)
1985 Professionnel |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:47 pm |
|
|
sandranian |
Site Admin |
|
|
Joined: 27 Feb 2006 |
Posts: 2701 |
Location: Southern California |
|
|
|
They used to do that with Derny racing as well (the short front wheelbase), and designed bikes with forks turned backwards in order to get closer to the derny to draft.
Again...why, on a 50 mile individual TT, would you want track geometry? Why would you want it on a 20 mile TT? It just doesn't make sense, specially because the courses would not (most likely) be technical.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Penny whistles... | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:51 pm |
|
|
verktyg |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Jan 2007 |
Posts: 2814 |
Location: SF Bay Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:00 pm |
|
|
Gtane |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Sep 2007 |
Posts: 681 |
Location: UK |
|
|
|
Chas,
LOL
Surely it depends on the nationality of your machine, then again perhaps it does by reeling off the various whistled anthems for each component too, as the machine winds its way off a lengthy mountain pass.
Tim |
|
_________________ Everything has a cycle |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:08 pm |
|
|
Gtane |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Sep 2007 |
Posts: 681 |
Location: UK |
|
|
|
Paul Wiseman wrote: |
Gtane wrote: |
Chas,
That drilled machine really is a work of art. Perhaps this is something that might make a return.
I wonder, could we see drilled carbon fibre components, on a carbon frame?
Tim |
Here ya go
Although, I think it would be moulded rather than drilled. Does that make it mouldium?
[img]http:
//www.postimage.org/gx2nW7V0.jpg[/img] |
Wisey,
Of course, the new Super Record. Thanks for the prompt. So it's here.
Chas,
...and for handlebars from the great Alf Engers - http://bikebrothers.co.uk/engers_files/bars/alfs3.jpg
Tim |
|
_________________ Everything has a cycle |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:21 pm |
|
|
Gtane |
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Sep 2007 |
Posts: 681 |
Location: UK |
|
|
|
sandranian wrote: |
They used to do that with Derny racing as well (the short front wheelbase), and designed bikes with forks turned backwards in order to get closer to the derny to draft.
Again...why, on a 50 mile individual TT, would you want track geometry? Why would you want it on a 20 mile TT? It just doesn't make sense, specially because the courses would not (most likely) be technical.... |
Stephan,
The rules now dictate so much regards length, weight, height, saddle position, bar height and position, etc, etc. It was never like this to the same degree in times gone by. If these rules were not in place we would see more radical designs and probably a continuation of compact wheelbase frames. You'll notice that many TT machines now have a front wheel much further forwards with a move away from parallel angles on some machines. Much bicycle design innovation was restricted after Graeme Obree's creations, and track and TT successes, of the early '90s and earlier.
Regards why, well, for me it was all power to the road and responsiveness, as well as an eagle eye on your peers' machines. I've ridden a few TTs and to ride a bike that's not lively made me feel slower. I wanted to be on top of the bike driving it forwards to the line. Any feeling of slackness, heaviness or one of not being in total control for the goal, I tried to eradicate in the garage.
Tim |
|
_________________ Everything has a cycle |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:24 pm |
|
|
sandranian |
Site Admin |
|
|
Joined: 27 Feb 2006 |
Posts: 2701 |
Location: Southern California |
|
|
|
Sure...and I know about the new restrictions, but that isn't what we are talking about. I would think that getting beaten up over a long TT on a bike with "track" geometry would eventually kill someone. Anquetil, one of the best TTers of all time, used a slack bike, as did Hinault...
But I guess a lot of it is voodoo, so that might explain it as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:49 pm |
|
|
vanhelmont |
|
|
|
Joined: 11 Dec 2007 |
Posts: 242 |
Location: Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 9:36 pm |
|
|
Paul Wiseman |
|
|
|
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 |
Posts: 584 |
Location: Brisbane, Australia |
|
|
|
sandranian wrote: |
Again...why, on a 50 mile individual TT, would you want track geometry? Why would you want it on a 20 mile TT? It just doesn't make sense, specially because the courses would not (most likely) be technical.... |
I agree with you totally. Even today, most of the carbon TT bikes have a tight front end. Aerodynamics aside, the tight rear end is a really bad idea, as the 10 speed drive trains work so much better with a longer rear end. The crossover on the chains is terrible with some of these TT bikes and causes a lot of friction in the drive train.
I think it has mostly to do with how things look. It seems to be far more important to 'look' fast than it is to 'be' fast. As an example we carry one of the modern lines of aero helmet. The particulat brand does 2 models, a shoet aero, and a long tail aero. The test specs show that the shorter helmet is the faster of the two, but we can't sell one, whereas the long one sells like hotcakes.
The desing of modern TT bikes is just terrible. Many of them still have steep seat angles which has been proved to be a bad idea time and time again. The Front end geo is all screwed because they want a slack head angle to make the top tube shorter, but this kicks the front wheel out too far for the 'fast look' they want so the make an integrated fork with deep aero sections so they can bring the front tips backward in relation to the steerer tube (= a straight track fork). Then the handle bar position is all wrong. They are designed so the aero bars are roughly in the right place, but they have to be mounted on one of these 'fast' looking base bars (bull horns). But the hand position ends up being about the height of you brake lever hood on your road bike but set back about 10cm. So now you have this ultra short, too high position on a bike that handles like 3 legged donkey.
This is why we see pro's falling off TT bikes, and why excellent bike handlers like Cadel Evans had to go slow on the descent in the first TT in last years Tour. Does anyone ever remember Merckx, Hinault, LeMond, Fignon, Kelly or anyone else falling off in a TT?
Poor design, crap bike, but damn they look fast!
OK, rant over. Have a good TT everyone.
p.s. My TT bike is a 54cm road frame kitted out as a TT bike. Works just fine and is quite comfortable to ride. (I normally rida a 59cm) |
|
_________________ Wisey
Brisbane, Australia
1974 Paris - Nice
1985 Defi
1985 Victoire
1985 Victoire (yes, another one!)
1985 Professionnel |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 9:43 pm |
|
|
Paul Wiseman |
|
|
|
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 |
Posts: 584 |
Location: Brisbane, Australia |
|
|
|
Speaking of TT bikes, has anyone seen this before?
|
|
_________________ Wisey
Brisbane, Australia
1974 Paris - Nice
1985 Defi
1985 Victoire
1985 Victoire (yes, another one!)
1985 Professionnel |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
|